From:���������������������������������������� Lucarelli, Zachary <[email protected]>

Sent:������������������������������������������ Thursday, July 17, 2025 11:12 AM

To:���������������������������������������������� Berriz, Sonia (Consultant); Lovering, Janka (Consultant)

Cc:���������������������������������������������� Holmquist, Dan (Consultant); Pao, Evelyn C.; Pang, Jason (Consultant); Bondy, Terry (Consultant); Prescott, Ryan; Prendergast, Patrick; Sharrer, Kyle; Petterson, Michelle; Bernauer, Colten

Subject:������������������������������������ Re: [EXTERNAL] NW-12 Load Rating Report Responses and Calcs

Attachments:������������������������� Bothell culvert cross box access.pdf

 

Supplemental info for a "break" in the shoring posts to allow for access within the vault at the access points.

 

Thanks,

 

Zach

 

From: Lucarelli, Zachary <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, July 7, 2025 4:17 PM
To: Berriz, Sonia (Consultant) <[email protected]>; Lovering, Janka (Consultant) <[email protected]>
Cc: Holmquist, Dan (Consultant) <[email protected]>; Pao, Evelyn C. <[email protected]>; Pang, Jason (Consultant) <[email protected]>; Bondy, Terry (Consultant) <[email protected]>; Prescott, Ryan <[email protected]>; Prendergast, Patrick <[email protected]>; Sharrer, Kyle <[email protected]>; Petterson, Michelle <[email protected]>; Bernauer, Colten <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] NW-12 Load Rating Report Responses and Calcs

 

Sonia/Janka,

 

See attached. Let us know if you have any questions.

 

Thanks,

 

Zach

 

From: Berriz, Sonia (Consultant) <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 9:39 AM
To: Sharrer, Kyle <[email protected]>
Cc: Lucarelli, Zachary <[email protected]>; Lovering, Janka (Consultant) <[email protected]>; Holmquist, Dan (Consultant) <[email protected]>; Prendergast, Patrick <[email protected]>; Pao, Evelyn C. <[email protected]>; Prescott, Ryan <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] NW-12 Load Rating Report Responses and Calcs

 

Hi Kyle,

 

I wanted to make sure we reiterate the importance of the bullets I sent last week.

 

Please ensure your next submittal has these elements addressed/discussed.

 

  • How to maintain access that meets L & I requirements
  • When concrete/rebar are unknown � the BDM points to AASHTO�s Bridge Evaluation Manual. This document states in section 6A.5.2., unknown steel constructed during or after 1954 shall use fy=40ksi and concrete 3 ksi.
  • The struts being placed interior to the structure � there are several concerns
    • These are not meant for long term dynamic loading � one thought was to have the manufacturer weigh in on the use/longevity of the bracing system
    • How frequently will the team get into the vault to ensure/fix any of the floor props that have fallen? The bridge group was suggesting a weekly check on the vault.
    • How will the floor props be pre-loaded and how will it be designed so they don�t punch through the concrete?

 

In addition, we have been looking through the Environmental Health and Safety Plan but don�t think it covers the requirements of 2.13.6.2 which requires inspection and access plans for enclosed spaces. Let me know your thoughts there.

 

Thank you,

 

-Sonia

 

Sonia Berriz, P.E.
[email protected]
(425) 876-6283 (cell)

 

UPCOMING PTO � 6/26 � 7/14

 

From: Berriz, Sonia (Consultant)
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2025 7:35 AM
To: Sharrer, Kyle <[email protected]>
Cc: Lucarelli, Zachary <[email protected]>; Petterson, Michelle <[email protected]>; Lovering, Janka (Consultant) <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] NW-12 Load Rating Report Responses and Calcs

 

Hi Kyle,

 

Please see attached feedback from structures.

 

The larger topics:

  • How to maintain access that meets L & I requirements
  • When concrete/rebar are unknown � the BDM points to AASHTO�s Bridge Evaluation Manual. This document states in section 6A.5.2., unknown steel constructed during or after 1954 shall use fy=40ksi and concrete 3 ksi.
  • The struts being placed interior to the structure � there are several concerns
    • These are not meant for long term dynamic loading � one thought was to have the manufacturer weigh in on the use/longevity of the bracing system
    • How frequently will the team get into the vault to ensure/fix any of the floor props that have fallen? The bridge group was suggesting a weekly check on the vault.
    • How will the floor props be pre-loaded and how will it be designed so they don�t punch through the concrete?

 

I generally have direction/a path to successfully move forward but I am unsure of what that is here. The question that keeps being asked is can they use baker tanks and take the vault offline?

 

An option I heard floating around was � could you build a frame around the vault and place steel plates on top so the load isn�t on the lid of the vault? I think you are too far along for that to be a reasonable option. There was discussion about building a wall on the interior of the vault but that was met with resistance due to accessibility.

 

Thank you,

 

-Sonia

 

Sonia Berriz, P.E.
[email protected]
(425) 876-6283 (cell)

 

UPCOMING PTO � 6/26 � 7/14

 

From: Sharrer, Kyle <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2025 12:29 PM
To: Berriz, Sonia (Consultant) <[email protected]>
Cc: Lucarelli, Zachary <[email protected]>; Petterson, Michelle <[email protected]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] NW-12 Load Rating Report Responses and Calcs

 

WARNING: This email originated from outside of WSDOT. Please use caution with links and attachments.

 

Sonia,

 

Please see load rating report responses and calcs attached.

 

Can you please send these to your SME�s for closure?

 

Thanks,

 

Kyle Sharrer 

+1 909 721 9753